ZHCSEO0B February   2016  – April 2018 CSD87335Q3D

PRODUCTION DATA.  

  1. 1特性
  2. 2应用
  3. 3说明
    1.     俯视图
      1.      Device Images
  4. 4修订历史记录
  5. 5Specifications
    1. 5.1 Absolute Maximum Ratings
    2. 5.2 Recommended Operating Conditions
    3. 5.3 Thermal Information
    4. 5.4 Power Block Performance
    5. 5.5 Electrical Characteristics
    6. 5.6 Typical Power Block Device Characteristics
    7. 5.7 Typical Power Block MOSFET Characteristics
  6. 6Applications and Implementation
    1. 6.1 Application Information
      1. 6.1.1 Equivalent System Performance
    2. 6.2 Power Loss Curves
    3. 6.3 Safe Operating Curves (SOA)
    4. 6.4 Normalized Curves
    5. 6.5 Calculating Power Loss and SOA
      1. 6.5.1 Design Example
      2. 6.5.2 Calculating Power Loss
      3. 6.5.3 Calculating SOA Adjustments
  7. 7Recommended PCB Design Overview
    1. 7.1 Electrical Performance
    2. 7.2 Thermal Performance
  8. 8器件和文档支持
    1. 8.1 接收文档更新通知
    2. 8.2 社区资源
    3. 8.3 商标
    4. 8.4 静电放电警告
    5. 8.5 Glossary
  9. 9机械、封装和可订购信息
    1. 9.1 Q3D 封装尺寸
    2. 9.2 焊盘布局建议
    3. 9.3 模板建议
    4. 9.4 Q3D 卷带信息
    5. 9.5 引脚配置

封装选项

机械数据 (封装 | 引脚)
散热焊盘机械数据 (封装 | 引脚)
订购信息

Equivalent System Performance

Many of today’s high-performance computing systems require low-power consumption in an effort to reduce system operating temperatures and improve overall system efficiency. This has created a major emphasis on improving the conversion efficiency of today’s synchronous buck topology. In particular, there has been an emphasis in improving the performance of the critical power semiconductor in the power stage of this application (see Figure 27). As such, optimization of the power semiconductors in these applications, needs to go beyond simply reducing RDS(ON).

CSD87335Q3D Equivalent_System_Top.gifFigure 27. Equivalent System Schematic

The CSD87335Q3D is part of TI’s power block product family which is a highly optimized product for use in a synchronous buck topology requiring high current, high efficiency, and high frequency. It incorporates TI’s latest generation silicon which has been optimized for switching performance, as well as minimizing losses associated with QGD, QGS, and QRR. Furthermore, TI’s patented packaging technology has minimized losses by nearly eliminating parasitic elements between the control FET and sync FET connections (see Figure 28). A key challenge solved by TI’s patented packaging technology is the system level impact of Common Source Inductance (CSI). CSI greatly impedes the switching characteristics of any MOSFET which in turn increases switching losses and reduces system efficiency. As a result, the effects of CSI need to be considered during the MOSFET selection process. In addition, standard MOSFET switching loss equations used to predict system efficiency need to be modified in order to account for the effects of CSI. Further details behind the effects of CSI and modification of switching loss equations are outlined in Power Loss Calculation With Common Source Inductance Consideration for Synchronous Buck Converters (SLPA009).

CSD87335Q3D Equivalent_System_Bottom.gifFigure 28. Elimination of Parasitic Inductances

The combination of TI’s latest generation silicon and optimized packaging technology has created a benchmarking solution that outperforms industry standard MOSFET chipsets of similar RDS(ON) and MOSFET chipsets with lower RDS(ON). Figure 29 and Figure 30 compare the efficiency and power loss performance of the CSD87335Q3D versus industry standard MOSFET chipsets commonly used in this type of application. This comparison purely focuses on the efficiency and generated loss of the power semiconductors only. The performance of CSD87335Q3D clearly highlights the importance of considering the effective AC on-impedance (ZDS(ON)) during the MOSFET selection process of any new design. Simply normalizing to traditional MOSFET RDS(ON) specifications is not an indicator of the actual in-circuit performance when using TI’s power block technology.

CSD87335Q3D D030_SLPS574.gif
Figure 29. Efficiency
CSD87335Q3D D031_SLPS574.gif
Figure 30. Power Loss

Table 1 compares the traditional DC measured RDS(ON) of CSD87335Q3D versus its ZDS(ON). This comparison takes into account the improved efficiency associated with TI’s patented packaging technology. As such, when comparing TI’s power block products to individually packaged discrete MOSFETs or dual MOSFETs in a standard package, the in-circuit switching performance of the solution must be considered. In this example, individually packaged discrete MOSFETs or dual MOSFETs in a standard package would need to have DC measured RDS(ON) values that are equivalent to CSD87335Q3D’s ZDS(ON) value in order to have the same efficiency performance at full load. Mid to light-load efficiency will still be lower with individually packaged discrete MOSFETs or dual MOSFETs in a standard package.

Table 1. Comparison of RDS(ON) vs. ZDS(ON)

PARAMETER HS LS
TYP MAX TYP MAX
Effective AC on-impedance ZDS(ON) (VGS = 5 V) 6.7 1.9
DC measured RDS(ON) (VGS = 4.5 V) 6.7 8.1 3.1 3.9

The CSD87335Q3D NexFET™ power block is an optimized design for synchronous buck applications using 5-V gate drive. The control FET and sync FET silicon are parametrically tuned to yield the lowest power loss and highest system efficiency. As a result, a new rating method is needed which is tailored towards a more systems-centric environment. System-level performance curves such as power loss, Safe Operating Area (SOA), and normalized graphs allow engineers to predict the product performance in the actual application.