SLYA042 July   2024 FDC1004 , FDC1004-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. Introduction
  5. CSAs and Input Bias Stage
  6. CSA and Gain Error Factor
  7. Applications for Resistance at Input Pins of Current Sense Amplifiers
    1. 4.1 Input Resistance Design Considerations
  8. Applications for Input Resistance at Reference Pins of Current Sense Amplifiers
    1. 5.1 Bidirectional CSA and Applications
    2. 5.2 Driving CSA Reference Pin With High-Resistance Source Voltage
    3. 5.3 Input Resistance at Reference Pin Design Considerations
  9. Design Procedure and Error Calculation for External Input Resistance on CSA
    1. 6.1 Calculating eEXT for INA185A4 With 110Ω Input Resistors
  10. Design Procedure for Input Resistance on Capacitively-Coupled Current Sense Amplifier
    1. 7.1 Bench Verification of Input eEXT for Capacitively-Coupled Current Sense Amplifiers
  11. Design Procedure for Input Resistance at CSA Reference Pins
  12. Input Resistance Error Test with INA185 Over Temperature
    1. 9.1 Schematic
    2. 9.2 Methods
    3. 9.3 Theoretical Model
    4. 9.4 Data for INA185A4 with 110Ω Input Resistors
      1. 9.4.1 Data Calculations
    5. 9.5 Analysis
  13. 10Input Resistance Error Test with INA191 Over Temperature
    1. 10.1 Schematic
    2. 10.2 Methods
    3. 10.3 Theoretical Model
    4. 10.4 Data for INA191A4 With 2.2kΩ Input Resistors
      1. 10.4.1 Data Analysis
    5. 10.5 Analysis
  14. 11Derivation of VOS, EXT for a Single Stage Current Sense Amplifier (CSA)
  15. 12Summary
  16. 13References

Introduction

Most current sense amplifiers (CSA) have input resistances much lower than similarly closed-loop instrumentation (in-amps) and difference amplifiers. This is primarily because of the non-isolated connections to the inputs pin, but also due to the input bias stage in between input pins. Thus, CSAs ideally should have little to no external input resistances (REXT < 10Ω) at input pins; however, certain applications may require higher REXT and thus it becomes crucial to understand and calculate worst-case error to see if circuit still meet system requirements.

In recent years, capacitively-coupled input current sense amplifiers (for example, INA190 or INA191) can present much higher effective differential resistances in the range to 2MΩ to 5MΩ over temperature.

 Simplified INA191 Functional Block DiagramFigure 1-1 Simplified INA191 Functional Block Diagram
 INA191 Differential Input Resistance Over TemperatureFigure 1-2 INA191 Differential Input Resistance Over Temperature

These devices can easily measure lower current in the micro-Amps range and also maintain high accuracy with larger input resistors. Note that capacitively-coupled input amplifiers often require some differential input capacitance at the input pins whenever significant external impedance is present. This is to help provide charge to internal switching capacitors.

The other important input loading resistance for most CSAs and difference amplifiers is the reference voltage source resistance (REXT3). Reference (REF) pins allow the output of bidirectional CSAs to be biased to voltage when the measuring 0-V differentially. System design cost and complexity can be reduced by simply driving REF pins with a resistor divider as opposed to a low-impedance source. However, all error sources and loss of dynamic range must be considered and bounded. For a detailed analysis of error generated from loading REF pins, refer to Driving Voltage Reference Pins of Current-Sensing Amplifiers, application note.

Overall, higher input impedance devices can be more accurate with external loading; however with only a few specifications of process variation, a system designer using a CSA with REXT >10Ω can achieve manageable error targets in low-accuracy, but low-cost and small PCB systems. This document shows how to calculate the bounds of this input resistance over temperature. In many cases a one-point, offset calibration is most practical.