SLYA042 July   2024 FDC1004 , FDC1004-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. Introduction
  5. CSAs and Input Bias Stage
  6. CSA and Gain Error Factor
  7. Applications for Resistance at Input Pins of Current Sense Amplifiers
    1. 4.1 Input Resistance Design Considerations
  8. Applications for Input Resistance at Reference Pins of Current Sense Amplifiers
    1. 5.1 Bidirectional CSA and Applications
    2. 5.2 Driving CSA Reference Pin With High-Resistance Source Voltage
    3. 5.3 Input Resistance at Reference Pin Design Considerations
  9. Design Procedure and Error Calculation for External Input Resistance on CSA
    1. 6.1 Calculating eEXT for INA185A4 With 110Ω Input Resistors
  10. Design Procedure for Input Resistance on Capacitively-Coupled Current Sense Amplifier
    1. 7.1 Bench Verification of Input eEXT for Capacitively-Coupled Current Sense Amplifiers
  11. Design Procedure for Input Resistance at CSA Reference Pins
  12. Input Resistance Error Test with INA185 Over Temperature
    1. 9.1 Schematic
    2. 9.2 Methods
    3. 9.3 Theoretical Model
    4. 9.4 Data for INA185A4 with 110Ω Input Resistors
      1. 9.4.1 Data Calculations
    5. 9.5 Analysis
  13. 10Input Resistance Error Test with INA191 Over Temperature
    1. 10.1 Schematic
    2. 10.2 Methods
    3. 10.3 Theoretical Model
    4. 10.4 Data for INA191A4 With 2.2kΩ Input Resistors
      1. 10.4.1 Data Analysis
    5. 10.5 Analysis
  14. 11Derivation of VOS, EXT for a Single Stage Current Sense Amplifier (CSA)
  15. 12Summary
  16. 13References

Calculating eEXT for INA185A4 With 110Ω Input Resistors

Use the previous equations to perform an analysis on a hypothetical circuit with the INA185A4 with 110Ω resistors (REXT) at input pins. Consider the following circuit parameters:

Table 6-1 Required Device and Circuit Parameters To Calculate eEXT
Parameter Nominal Value Tolerance Drift (ppm/°C)
VS 5V 0% 0
VCM 12V 0% 0
TA, Max 100°C N/A N/A
RSH 1mΩ 0.1% ± 50ppm/°C
REXT 110Ω 0.1% ± 20ppm/°C
RFB 500kΩ Process Variation (PV) ± 20% Process Variation Temperature Coefficient = ± 30ppm/°C
RINT 2.5kΩ
RBIAS 2.5kΩ
IOS/2 Max ± 225nA 0 ± 10
IB, CM ON 58µA 20% ± 157ppm/°C
GainDevice 200V/V 0.25% ± 8ppm/°C
GainTotal, Typical 176.67844523V/V Variable Variable

Most of the fundamental circuit parameters needed are found in data sheet. However there is some calculation and estimation needed for IOS and IB, CM ON.

Typical IOS is usually very small; however, this can increase for any ratio mismatch between the RBIAS/2 resistors seen in Figure 2-1 and mismatch between the RINT and RFB resistors on the positive (non-inverting) and negative (inverting) branches of the internal amplifier network.

As stated previously, matching of resistors ratios is very small, but can be conservatively approximated by device's typical gain error of ±0.25%. Using this information, one can simulate the ideal amplifier network and measure maximum IOS by setting all resistors in one branch to +0.25% and in the other branch set to -0.25%. For VCM = 16V, IOS is 450µA. Since all resistors will have the same drift, IOS drift will be fairly low and simply approximated as 10ppm/°C. If a one-point calibration is performed, then error from IOS will be negated. Please contact TI support for more information if necessary.

 Worst-Case IOS For
                    Single-Stage CSA Figure 6-1 Worst-Case IOS For Single-Stage CSA

For IB, CM ON, the typical value is simply the jump in IB, CM as shown in Figure 2-2. Tolerance can be approximated as process variation. Drift can be deduced by IB, CM versus temperature data plots in data sheet. For the INA185, the data sheet shows a 2µA change in IB, CM from -40°C to 125°C. Assume this value is 3µA and you can determine drift in ppm/°C as:

Equation 17. I B ,   C M   O N   D r i f t   = ± 10 6 ×   Δ I B ,   C M × 0 . 5 Δ T A × 1 I B ,   C M   O N

Lastly temperature dependencies in VS and especially VCM need to be considered as these can add to the offset drift, which cannot be calibrated.

The calculated eEXT values at 25° and maximum ambient temperature are shown in Table 6-2.

Offset Values are Referred-to-Shunt (RTS) Using Worst-Case GEF at 125°C

Table 6-2 Maximum Offset and Gain Errors and Drift for INA185A4 with 110Ω (0.1%, 20ppm/°C) Input Resistors at VCM = 12V and VREF=140mV
TA (°C) High Low
VOS, EXT Max (µV) 25 °C 71.45 -71.25
125 °C 115.82 -115.62
EG, EXT Max 25 °C 1.99209% -2.84638%
125 °C 2.04245% -2.91539%
EG EXT, Drift (ppm/°C) 5.057 -6.902
VOS EXT, Drift (µV/°C) 0.442 -0.444
VOS, EXT Calibrated, 25°C (µV) 44.37 -44.37

Note that worst-case VOS, EXT occurs when PV = -20%.

Table 6-3 shows offset values for both RTI and RTS along with the GEF used to convert them. The RTI values match the VB measurement in simulation of the circuit as well shown in Figure 6-2.

Table 6-3 VOS, EXT Max Value in Both RTI and RTS with GEF
TA High Low
VOS, EXT Max RTS 25 °C 71.45 -71.25
125 °C 115.82 -115.62
VOS, EXT Max RTI 25 °C 61.32 -71.25
125 °C 99.36 -99.21
GEF 25 °C 0.85832855 0.85840965
125 °C 0.85788132 0.85812512
 Simulation of Example at
                    125°C Figure 6-2 Simulation of Example at 125°C
 Total Error Comparisons with
                    One-Point Offset Calibration at 25°C Figure 6-3 Total Error Comparisons with One-Point Offset Calibration at 25°C