SPRUI78D March 2019 – January 2022 TMS320F28075 , TMS320F28075-Q1 , TMS320F28076 , TMS320F28374D , TMS320F28374S , TMS320F28375D , TMS320F28375S , TMS320F28375S-Q1 , TMS320F28376D , TMS320F28376S , TMS320F28377D , TMS320F28377D-Q1 , TMS320F28377S , TMS320F28377S-Q1 , TMS320F28378D , TMS320F28378S , TMS320F28379D , TMS320F28379D-Q1 , TMS320F28379S
Various safety mechanisms in the devices are either always-on (see SRAM ECC, CPU Handling of Illegal Operation, Illegal Results and Instruction Trapping, and so forth) or executed periodically (see CPU Hardware Built-In Self-Test (HWBIST), VCU CRC Check of Static Memory Contents, and so forth) by the application software. The time between the executions of online diagnostic tests by a safety mechanism is termed as Diagnostic test interval (DTI). Once the fault is detected, depending on the fault reaction of the associated fault (for example, external system reaction to ERRORSTS pin assertion), the system will enter in the safe-state. The time-span in which a fault or faults can be present in a system before a hazardous event occurs is called Fault Tolerant Time Interval (FTTI) as defined in ISO 26262. This is similar to Process Safety Time (PST) defined in IEC 61508. Figure 4-4 illustrates the relationship between DTI, Fault Reaction Time and FTTI.
The frequency and extent of each of the Level 2 and Level 3 checks should be consistent with the Fault Tolerant Time Interval (FTTI). Figure 4-5 illustrates the frequency of the required checks. The checks should be such that single point faults of the microcontroller should be detected and responded to, such that the TMS320F2837xD/S and TMS320F2807x MCU enters a safe state within the FTTI budget. The microcontroller on detection of a fault enters into one of the safe states as illustrated in Figure 4-9. An example of a diagnostic for single point faults is ECC/Parity for memories.
The proposed functional safety concept, subsequent functional safety features and configurations explained in this document are for reference purpose only. The system and equipment designer or manufacturer is responsible to ensure that the end systems (and any Texas Instruments hardware or software components incorporated in the systems) meet all applicable safety, regulatory and system-level performance requirements.